[Anima] Pete Resnick's No Objection on charter-ietf-anima-00-17: (with COMMENT)

["Pete Resnick" <[e-mail]>]

Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-anima-00-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-anima/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sad that two of my comments on the previously reviewed charter were
ignored, especially when Brian said that he was going to make changes:

1st paragraph:

   An autonomic function works in a distributed way across various
   network elements, but allowing central guidance and reporting, and
   co-existence with non-autonomic methods of management.

Do all autonomic functions work distributed? I'm not sure what this
means.

Brian's response: "If they aren't distributed, they just aren't
candidates for protocol work. I think the logic of this sentence needs
adjustment."

9th paragraph:

   Definition of a discovery functionality for autonomic functions

I don't understand what that means. By "functionality" do you mean
protocol?

Brian's response: "Definition of a discovery protocol for autonomic
nodes."