Re: [Anima] Draft Charter 2.0.8

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Bill

Having looked through a range of other charters before writing the
current text, my feeling was that mentioning of drafts in charter is
quite uncommon, so we tried to minimize this. The one exception we made
was for the reference model, because it really is something like our
current thinking of the blueprint for the overall intended ANIMA technical
scope (without implying which parts thereof should be on any specific charter).

Cheers
    Toerless

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 02:35:32PM -0400, William Atwood wrote:
> In view of the fact that the Reference Model is specified as
> "draft-ietf-anima-reference-model already approved for publication", and
> that the ACP and Vouchers are specified by their RFC numbers, and that
> BRSKI and GRASP are just as important as building blocks, I suggest that
> citations should be given for BRSKI and GRASP.
> 
>   Bill
> -- 
> Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng.             tel:   [phone] x3046
> Distinguished Professor Emeritus  fax:   [phone]
> Department of Computer Science
>    and Software Engineering
> Concordia University EV 3.185     email:[e-mail]
> 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West    http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill
> Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

-- 
---
[e-mail]