Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Fri, 18 November 2016 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F6F1295C8 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:24:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Gh6QPSFovZ6 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3ED31293FD for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:24:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16820; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479435845; x=1480645445; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=aHzXZuvRSXKduMOw6bTADh+lpYyneB4CJUI7/aEPMY8=; b=dbv77X3Oq+7t/mM9aikz1QRjOHx/45HDib23y+e48Kdzmm78X8XvBtxf 7T/DGvslTVSpNPOvSihLOELIuR0aGxeqLIzyqmEg9XIU3D8GXcnElVMft rl2o5cA99UfruwhO5T+Mi3cxpF2sKb9uE+8FA3QDGSZ+DoLaICL2DX0fA E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BaAQB5ZS5Y/51dJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnNEAQEBAQEfWIEAB404lxCPSYUbggcdAQqEaYEQAhqCBT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaAEBAQQBAQEgCkEbAgEIEQQBASgDAgICJQsUCQgBAQQBEgiIZA6sM4IpL4soAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIY8hFqEYB+CToJdBZpDAYY/iiaBd0+EJ4lAjVCECgEeN4ELHYUecoZtgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,655,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="348055913"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2016 02:24:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAI2O4d1001726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:24:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:24:04 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:24:03 -0600
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: Laurent Ciavaglia <Laurent.Ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?
Thread-Index: AdJBPZCUap75TyB7THivcdpl+3+EcAANNHQAAAvsTaA=
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:24:03 +0000
Message-ID: <8934c1bb6dbb47878a0f8b911376bad7@XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com>
References: <7f30b33118334c09a54acb9293b2c265@XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com> <ee95389f-d74d-a5f1-6292-ba875613e6a2@nokia-bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <ee95389f-d74d-a5f1-6292-ba875613e6a2@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.231.136]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8934c1bb6dbb47878a0f8b911376bad7XCHRCD006ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/re3fS4ESF2UlqEPVf4yoQ5bdlro>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:24:07 -0000

Agree, Laurent. Then let’s nail this down in the Intent draft: “Intent is defined per Autonomic Function”.
Michael
From: Laurent Ciavaglia [mailto:Laurent.Ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com]
Sent: 18 November 2016 11:04
To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehring@cisco.com>; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

Michael,

Definitely not designed per ASA.

As mentioned at the mic, in draft-peloso (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peloso-anima-autonomic-function), we've proposed format for "intent" at the AF level.
Please note, that once "resolved" the AF intent will exist (be translated) in the instances of the AF (the ASAs) as AF instance descriptor. This is ASA-level/specific information.

Best regards, Laurent.
On 18/11/2016 02:53, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:

One question that just came up: Should Intent be designed per ASA or per AF?



My suggestion previously was to segment Intent into sections per Autonomic Functions.



Example: Intent for the bootstrap function could be:

- allow bootstrapping new devices only during maintenance window



For such Intent, action could be taken on the registrar (one ASA of the AF), or on the proxy (another ASA of the same AF).



It seems to me an author of an AF might like all ASAs of his AF to know about the Intent, because the proxy may also take actions.



Michael



_______________________________________________

Anima mailing list

Anima@ietf.org<mailto:Anima@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima



--

Laurent Ciavaglia
Nokia, Bell Labs

+33 160 402 636
route de Villejust - Nozay, France
linkedin.com/in/laurent.ciavaglia