IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-vanderstok-constrained-anima-dtls-join-proxy-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 05 October 2018 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF798130E02 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 06:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFrDuED25oMm for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 06:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF83128CF3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 06:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2C020090; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:31:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 5A6292354; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562FC12A0; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
cc: anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <659e84c2-551c-4b7c-1002-b156337a92ac@gmail.com>
References: <153825200726.18811.5817453433918930845@ietfa.amsl.com> <659e84c2-551c-4b7c-1002-b156337a92ac@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 09:31:17 -0400
Message-ID: <24292.1538746277@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/vtQfA28-24YA-ogVZyOowUgKrTo>
Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-vanderstok-constrained-anima-dtls-join-proxy-00.txt
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:31:25 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > How does the constrained pledge discover the LL address of the
    > constrained proxy?

Depends upon the target environment.

If ANIMA, then it would use GRASP, and probably we need to define an
extension to the AN_Proxy announcement as previously discussed.
I guess that extension could go into this document.

If 6tisch, then it would use enhanced beacons.
If something else, TBD.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email