[Ans-research] Network Scalability

"Foo Yee Loo" <ylfoo@mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Sun, 07 December 2003 14:29 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24124 for <ans-research-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:29:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASzuE-0005qF-DT for ans-research-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:29:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hB7ET6sT022451 for ans-research-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:29:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASzuE-0005q2-AI for ans-research-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:29:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24090 for <ans-research-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:28:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASzuC-0001bM-00 for ans-research-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:29:04 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASzuC-0001b9-00 for ans-research-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:29:04 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASzu8-0005oY-9a; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:29:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ASztR-0005nW-Mo for ans-research@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:28:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24033 for <ans-research@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:28:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASztP-0001ZX-00 for ans-research@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:28:16 -0500
Received: from saffron.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp ([133.11.236.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ASztP-0001ZP-00 for ans-research@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:28:15 -0500
Received: from saffron.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7A92CE9AF for <ans-research@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:28:11 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ylfoo (germanchamomile.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.236.2]) by saffron.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9C32CE9A9 for <ans-research@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:28:10 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <008401c3bcce$57c6b130$f608a8c0@ylfoo>
From: Foo Yee Loo <ylfoo@mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To: ans-research@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:28:11 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Ans-research] Network Scalability
Sender: ans-research-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ans-research-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ans-research@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ans-research>, <mailto:ans-research-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Ad hoc Network Scaling Research <ans-research.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ans-research@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ans-research-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ans-research>, <mailto:ans-research-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

Greetings. I am new in the field of ad hoc network, so please pardon me for
asking a naive question: what is the importance of finding out the
scalability of ad hoc network?
Arpacioglu et al. in [1] have pointed out the importance of knowing the
scalability of the methods in use in an ad hoc network, as allowing us to
see which method is more scalable. But scalability of a method is not the
scalability of a network. Santivanez et al. in [2] have mentioned that we
can know which type of network (purely ad hoc, hybrid, etc.) scales better
than the other. However, isn't the choice of network type should depend on
the usage scenario instead of scalability? Various usage scenarios have been
summarized by Yang et al. in [3].
Santivanez et al. also mentioned about the possible desire of knowing
whether a network is scalable in [2]. However, according to [1], absolute
scalability of a method may not be possible in many situations. If any
method is unlikely to be absolutely scalable, is it likely that a network is
absolutely scalable? If the answer is not, then what is the importance of
knowing the scalability of ad hoc network?

[1] Arpacioglu, Small, and Haas, "Notes on scalability of wireless ad hoc
networks", Internet draft, work in progress, 2003.
[2] Santivanez, McDonald, Stavrakakis, and Ramanathan, "On the scalability
of ad hoc routing protocols", IEEE INFOCOM'02, New York, June 2002.
[3] Yang, Conner, Guo, Hazra, and Zhu, "Common wireless ad hoc network usage
scenarios", Internet draft, work in progress, 2003.

Thank you for reading.

Regards,
Foo Yee Loo
Info. & Comm. Eng. Dept.
Grad. Sch. of Info. Sci. & Tech.
Univ. of Tokyo


_______________________________________________
Ans-research mailing list
Ans-research@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ans-research