Re>Zone Name Change Protoype
Sari Harrison <sdh@apple.com> Tue, 25 May 1993 18:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08210; 25 May 93 14:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08206; 25 May 93 14:46 EDT
Received: from cayman.cayman.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16448; 25 May 93 14:46 EDT
Received: by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA16663; Tue, 25 May 93 14:23:56 EDT
Return-Path: <sdh@apple.com>
Received: from apple.com by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA16659; Tue, 25 May 93 14:23:53 EDT
Received: from [17.190.56.127] by apple.com with SMTP (5.61/7-Aug-1992-eef) id AA09792; Tue, 25 May 93 11:23:44 -0700 for apple-ip@Cayman.com
Date: Tue, 25 May 1993 11:23:44 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Sari Harrison <sdh@apple.com>
Message-Id: <9305251823.AA09792@apple.com>
To: apple-ip@cayman.com
Subject: Re>Zone Name Change Protoype
Brad Parker writes: > I'm curious, however, why the routers need to stop emitting rtmp packets. >Is there a technical reason besides causing all the end-nodes to timeout? Nope. That's the only reason. >I'd prefer to see the end-nodes not all loose connectivity and end up >in the default zone. (maybe I misread that - do they only end up in >the default zone if they where in a zone which went away?) An end node whose default zone does not go away *will* stay there. No upgrades necessary! Ciao, <-- (I feel like I know you all so well :-)) Sari
- Re>Zone Name Change Protoype Sari Harrison