Re: [apps-discuss] WG summary: JCARDCAL
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 29 July 2013 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A4D21F9C4A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UCTlfHvZ5Tj for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F7D21F9EB2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:2001::1000]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AD32403E0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <51F6A7C5.6000203@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:35:01 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <51F6A55E.4010209@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <51F6A55E.4010209@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WG summary: JCARDCAL
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:36:43 -0000
Le 2013-07-29 19:24, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : > The JCARDCAL WG, which started after IETF 86, did not meet at IETF 87. > > The working group has two documents under consideration, one for the > jCard format and one for the jCal format. > > The draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard spec is in IESG review. > > The draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal spec is in WGLC. > > Both documents will be finished well before IETF 88, and the WG will > close once the documents are completed. JCARDCAL: the WG that meets deadlines and doesn't meet :) Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [apps-discuss] WG summary: JCARDCAL Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WG summary: JCARDCAL Simon Perreault