Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-01.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Sat, 19 May 2012 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB8621F869F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iV3c8y4PN3Je for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1EC21F869A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id BitR1j0010ZaKgw01itRUJ; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:53:25 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=MOXiabll c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=THrBGnCWI3EA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=b6nfwRhkAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Cb98M0iB5lcWAb3DVWkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:53:25 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNNYuRq7Rpc2BISU6dgVFmwX8GmJbQrBRQ
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:53:24 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928127103@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120519064927.27328.35927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120519064927.27328.35927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1337410405; bh=H8Rd7Cwel6b8LVsvroLWrbfRKM8q72Id1k86VaunR3w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=L+pz7Sggp25KMextiQ55AMAW8aH32JQ7X/eKUWym9NQ0lAttpIZr/L0mTqvmVtDGL oURg/tWvEx/9n2mh3gKxcD2Tom+Z/875l+RVh8ewmXiW6KQ+DdSO+5L9RtOO/t9vcR vqtGyQJ5gM/5palApPrJgh1qOqob/AVbQeBPy8y8=
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:53:37 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:49 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-01.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working
> Group Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Indicating Email Handling States in Trace Fields
> 	Author(s)       : D. Crocker
>                           Murray S. Kucherawy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2012-05-18
> 
>    This memo registers a trace field clause for use in indicating
>    transitions between handling queues or processing states, including
>    enacting inter- and intra-host message transitions.  This might
>    include message quarantining, mailing list moderation, timed
>    delivery, queueing for further analysis, content conversion, or other
>    similar causes, as well as optionally identifying normal handling
>    queues.

Incorporates feedback received to date, chiefly Ned's review suggestions but also some minor corrections from others.

-MSK