Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05

[Marc Petit-Huguenin <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Thanks for your review.  After discussion between authors, we decided to keep
the ABNF as it is in the document, but to update the design note.  Here's a
first draft of the revised design note:

"o  The ABNF in this document duplicates the <IP-literal>,
    <IPv4address>, and <reg-name> productions and other dependent
    productions from [RFC3986], instead of referencing them.  This is
    because the definitions in RFC 3986 are for hierarchical URIs, so
    using these references in an opaque URI made reviewers think that
    a hierarchical URI parser could be used to parse the URIs defined
    in this document."

As for the RFC 2119 boilerplate, it follows the new boilerplate suggestion at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/Draft2119BoilerplateSuggestions,
minus the keywords not used in the document.

Thanks.


On 08/04/2013 04:25 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this
> draft (for background on APPSDIR, please see 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate 
> ).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
> may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD 
> before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05 Title: Traversal Using 
> Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers Reviewer: S. 
> Moonesamy Review Date: August 4, 2013 IETF Last Call Date: July 19, 2013
> 
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed 
> Standard.
> 
> This document defines two URI schemes to provision the TURN Resolution 
> Mechanism.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> The Terminology Section is different from the usual RFC 2119 boilerplate. I
> am listing this as a minor issue for the attention of the Apps ADs.
> 
> This document restates the ABNF from RFC 3986.  I suggest including it by 
> reference.  Please note that I read Appendix B.
> 
> Nits:
> 
> This review does not include editorial nits.
> 
> Regards, S. Moonesamy
> 


- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: [e-mail]
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=Buh4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----