IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [IANA #900093] Re: draft-vesely-authmethod-dnswl

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CC312D7BF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7UUg7Ijo9eZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com (mail-vk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E42012B069 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t129so80770903vkg.2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=kmsxYGbq1du6OtTez7nNl/1sSusokOb8evTlQgFVAHM=; b=AwwUDXiFOOvrlD3FaQ0JIcc8J5xZJLmXTtPsfybVHzevtw8IuKrb0uHpA4wrjPruwm Q0h758Ci4RRB27IAuDdQLLepDXpDRTBMqkFqgPNIRctYtfVj6wrXHSrYsOV7ue/tBkth BE0h109YhBOkikMlB6zyJRa5VeYeH0vPKdLWtlUEc+j2dop31GDNXmhadwi3aveuQQI5 r1dNzo2fypPWjzmIINonKbp/1aL0Yj55wl6p3gOlsXgLY7yPZfqruTg862HQMgrRlyz/ ybU+66917URbwFW9Qps/H05KqOfkXmfeuaBceavVbyQtjhHWDHaJZZSGqhd/5tExgRSN PySQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=kmsxYGbq1du6OtTez7nNl/1sSusokOb8evTlQgFVAHM=; b=Ewa7VZa0x078Pl5hDxitnFUqm+r4xhtlYGuw2Oov+vL9aolBeZOpbeE8Wlhpzj9eyG f8y9qqSmU4B1sMcVuuvitRZtIkoqiMpU275dJHETO+nf5kM67ENjEzb4KcJjT070bLLZ JEY2jZ0L5977rAWcmoDodeakwgwy5529YGSKZeswjVn96nCRpgshZZ04GHacbjYp+uFC ggB07qZoQS+JMbTpy/FBl2URswBzRn59jiISzBLNO7tQHipY2Y/SFnOr12J1YHyeA9LF TVg0k4Wfyula3EJcHq5fNS8JZJhavfNRqwKOlQ4ka1YJqs11yr8JcjgnVyqVcugDRqot DgbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW+6lMd6ESmFaWtZs4nIg8sEGjXqdSPgOCUul6lSq0GCV3GZ9p3tfEKcvcXhojxozfxqAHk+QdyruaHAg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.171.143 with SMTP id u137mr5525398vke.88.1460571304526; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <570E8985.7080708@tana.it>
References: <CAL0qLwaGuz-CBMke3BhjfLwn7Bt213XobrOUe3_hAqxMZw+PKg@mail.gmail.com> <57025643.7040101@tana.it> <CAL0qLwb_8RN0w03N9P5xQsoC2aJppYTaBidmX_uuvioCJ6CaQg@mail.gmail.com> <5702946B.30307@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZAuVpWj-oDN6cyKiHmnJgpGdtyHKwMfz98v5odBOHTvw@mail.gmail.com> <570E8985.7080708@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:15:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa0FqQty+u3eDNQm7MJ_4KrveiyB80ukX3PZmpRARrnfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143e99cc6b8ec053061c11a"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/1LJmfFxZPUK_5SE-YkGX-38lVVQ>
Cc: Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net>, AppsAWG <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [IANA #900093] Re: draft-vesely-authmethod-dnswl
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:15:11 -0000

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> I still don't think it is worth publishing the I-D, but maybe IETF's list
> archives can be considered permanent documents, which can be referenced by
> items added after Expert Review, no?
>

That seems... unconventional at least.  I would rather see something
published.  Going via the ISE, if you're worried about the slog through the
IETF Stream, seems like a perfectly viable option.

> I had a look at your -04.  Thank you for addressing most of my comments
> and
> > suggestions; it's certainly better.  A few non-editorial issues remain:
> >
> > - The original ptype.property list has not been updated as discussed, so
> > the main problem remains.
>
> The "dns" ptype has its own table there.  Added a more text.  I don't think
> this is a useless ptype, since so much stuff is DNS-based...
>

I explained in my previous replies why I don't think "dns" is a viable
choice for a ptype.  I never said it was "useless", but it doesn't fit
within the framework described by RFC7601 or its antecedents.  I proposed
an alternative that I claim does fit.  Have you rejected it?


> > - You might want to include an example of use, perhaps in an appendix or
> in
> > a new Section 2.1, so people can see what's going on.
>
> A bare example was there already.  Fully expanded.
>

It looks great, modulo the issue above.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email