IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)

Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@proofpoint.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gshapiro@proofpoint.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B991AE076; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:59:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CznRJJ5Nxkk; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.proofpoint.com (mx2.proofpoint.com [208.86.202.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0905D1AE20D; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hq-cas02.corp.proofpoint.com (hq-cas02.corp.proofpoint.com [10.20.7.202]) by admin1010.us.proofpoint.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rALGwdod016093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:58:39 -0800
Received: from C02KN7GSDTY3.corp.proofpoint.com (208.86.202.10) by hq-cas02.corp.proofpoint.com (10.20.7.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:58:39 -0800
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:58:38 -0800
From: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@proofpoint.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20131121165838.GC78520@C02KN7GSDTY3.corp.proofpoint.com>
References: <20131121121728.12108.46847.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwaR7pvNxMgCz8gvFoj+ZX_nf=zL3KDqQxrFL8XxywKnKA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaR7pvNxMgCz8gvFoj+ZX_nf=zL3KDqQxrFL8XxywKnKA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Originating-IP: [208.86.202.10]
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-21_04:2013-11-21, 2013-11-21, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1311210116
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:42:00 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:05:44 -0000

>    I don't think I've ever seen an ambiguity in an email message that
>    included S/MIME or PGP, so I don't have much to offer here.  My
>    co-authors might, so I'll let them chime in if so.  I'll do a quick
>    look around to see what I can find.

Like Murray, I haven't observed any S/MIME or PGP mangling (which doesn't
mean it doesn't happen, just that it hasn't been caught).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email