IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-windows-image

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 13 January 2015 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAC31A9045 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaEmAEsv967O for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5751A8BB2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y19so4482140wgg.4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/33fRMt+mBm8chLaWLzVgZCcaNSq/7dwUVzsKhmKvxQ=; b=taDrGilR8ND8EmjimcXQJTnY2aIjdF9kMllvHRgUQuQvoq5irf6Ci+UdFYq3dwbbJi 7HuYeiTKtjfmBgLZ7zMw6yDt3uXSQxrSeNNErXHgLp6CX2cYU3mwXbisdi1SS2MXWg/d hHsBWMdvq7DDHEJDjpnmkWpzfIPG4HpK1kVDUikwcqbx8ey8TgDg0P6Ax+xJenN2HRQJ vxzXuWat9bFavDCFG2D/vJi4qMSdDt5MV7nff1isMmIXuRGKk3kyf6I9KBu3Y9Tx45Ns 4MyXXF33aCTV/OPGgkwG4xOzOxnE2cE1avya3E5+SmIJcApS9p16Si8V5NK/L3ixLu7r CZuw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.62.76 with SMTP id w12mr42034288wjr.5.1421171980414; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.204.198 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYf7dVOogiRte+v8PTLjKkZ+ZTkmoALV=ozUzvvZfbgMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYf7dVOogiRte+v8PTLjKkZ+ZTkmoALV=ozUzvvZfbgMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:59:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbxmdcyukvYhg2Nt3uBDeBYvKOyQDBzjzUNqL9E08v=xg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7ba977a40eb6e3050c8c635d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/35E9_qcBXz1JsKYPvRF4qNgNbPQ>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-windows-image
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:59:47 -0000

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This note starts a Call For Adoption for draft-seantek-windows-image.
> This work was presented as two separate drafts at the Honolulu meeting and
> appeared to have some support and no objection to processing through
> APPSAWG.
>
> Please reply with support or objection on this thread by January 9, 2015.
>

This call completed with three expressions of support, including the
author, and no further comments.  Thus, there does not appear to be enough
support at this time to adopt them as working group items.

I've consulted with my co-chair and our managing Area Director, and we
believe this (and the text/nfo document as well) is an excellent candidate
for processing through the Independent Submission Editor rather than
APPSAWG.  It will still receive the requisite IESG review per RFC6838 and,
of course, the media types reviewer(s).

The community is welcome to develop those documents on the apps-discuss
list until they are submitted to the ISE.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email