Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC1459 (3938)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 16 April 2014 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978F31A0206 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGkejKfJ25rE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD6A1A01E6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id pv20so8251674lab.37 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pZNvSUdcHP8fxJIdbfEOHolA3HWKM4zIeKEZu9uD3wg=; b=AqRjNwRwrYW+8pzjxCywPI5ru9GdKskM9nihwOQ5KY/1iYL/BAoHLqve1wz380Ij3Y r2Am9M5kRWtjSGv1Tqv8VQCJs800SEuDyzOh+ufIJNtD6rwC6ZULbUjwNd25ehtSZQK1 PNbtNLdK3Aj1mEX0kb3X4oDsjMJysEE21gwDTUdOhwlojBaWewsbIzHh8ExN3HTaOGS7 oZNrxVA4BAOLuG5hGMj3x26/cTREZzauk6IBmAbvRWOGDv9cuSylp22eID0lhYq00t2v clSpPOyPdokQg/eCnJYrv9jipq/weoSLHkLYCda6FSLuLs3LO6s/G/QMpPJ3AOMFDTTh Sf5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.234.130 with SMTP id ue2mr5992553lac.0.1397663792324; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.148.97 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140328105940.ADCCF7FC2CB@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20140328105940.ADCCF7FC2CB@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:56:32 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5ZsyEXMnGGHKWO0loArDIYjD4XA
Message-ID: <CALaySJLvh9iuYYCkzDgPD7hTW+sZTSd6XvcrJgkCu=cDM7pFzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/3VHpjfsm0ubqPy3M7VGyfa6K4KU
Cc: Myunggyun Jonathan Aldo Seo <tki@tki.so>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC1459 (3938)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:40 -0000

Myunggyun Jonathan Aldo Seo has reported the errata below, on RFC
1459, the IRC protocol.  He's correct that the last paragraph of
Section 4.2.3.1 has clearly been truncated.  But, as this is a
more-than-20-year-old document, it's likely hard to know what the text
was intended to say.

Here's Section 4.2.3.1 in its entirety:

-------------------------------------
4.2.3.1 Channel modes

   Parameters: <channel> {[+|-]|o|p|s|i|t|n|b|v} [<limit>] [<user>]
               [<ban mask>]

   The MODE command is provided so that channel operators may change the
   characteristics of `their' channel.  It is also required that servers
   be able to change channel modes so that channel operators may be
   created.

   The various modes available for channels are as follows:

           o - give/take channel operator privileges;
           p - private channel flag;
           s - secret channel flag;
           i - invite-only channel flag;
           t - topic settable by channel operator only flag;
           n - no messages to channel from clients on the outside;
           m - moderated channel;
           l - set the user limit to channel;
           b - set a ban mask to keep users out;
           v - give/take the ability to speak on a moderated channel;
           k - set a channel key (password).

   When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three
   per mode command has been imposed.  That is, any combination of 'o'
   and
-------------------------------------

I would like to mark the errata report as Verified, but it would be
nice to be able to suggest correct text in the report.  Can anyone
help figure out what was supposed to be there?  If not, I'll likely
mark it "Held For Document Update" instead.

Barry

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:59 AM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC1459,
> "Internet Relay Chat Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=1459&eid=3938
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Myunggyun Jonathan Aldo Seo <tki@tki.so>
>
> Section: 4.2.3.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three
>    per mode command has been imposed.  That is, any combination of 'o'
>    and
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The sentence lacks the last part and does not explain what it expected to.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC1459 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet Relay Chat Protocol
> Publication Date    : May 1993
> Author(s)           : J. Oikarinen, D. Reed
> Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
> Source              : Legacy
> Area                : Legacy
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>