IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 01 July 2010 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A8A3A684D; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfmQsJ0QinTi; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C553A6781; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com [64.101.72.121]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E380240E4D; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:52:20 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C2CC7C3.2020005@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:52:19 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
References: <201006302006.WAA26281@TR-Sys.de> <4C2BBEA8.6070904@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4C2BBEA8.6070904@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080709030704090406070500"
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alfred � <ah@TR-Sys.de>, tsvwg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports@tools.IETF.ORG
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:52:12 -0000

A point of clarification...

On 6/30/10 4:01 PM, Joe Touch wrote:

> "xmpp" is does not have an Assigned Number, and is not being used 'locally', and
> was never registered with the SRV registry either. Yes, there appear to be a few
> other uses of SRV records other than for the kind of services indicated in the
> IANA ports tale or the SRV registry.

XMPP does have two registered ports (5222 and 5269) but the XMPP WG has
been waiting for the service registry issue to be settled before adding
the appropriate service name registration to the IANA considerations for
draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis, which is currently in WGLC.

See for instance:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg00313.html

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email