IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Tue, 19 February 2013 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D93021F8D66 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cg5n04-ovxOk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [66.199.183.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ED921F8D63 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms5.on1.afilias-ops.info ([10.109.8.9] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1U7f0E-0002fX-69 for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:40:26 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f199.google.com ([74.125.82.199]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1U7f0E-0002ZH-5h for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:40:26 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f199.google.com with SMTP id t11so7482367wey.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=3SKuhKRYVdI0bOVkghqqmTvo4xMrrvWsR1VdjdiTIjo=; b=D0Ksl1RRcJKlGwoxHWitEy+5vWR78x7JjlBU2ND4GC6mFzUrYgKWnaxn2LQVZOpnJr dYvB+c4b1mxqC+v4FO9+/mYOP+3VQfs2divVQjbU4naN5KlXIPUjQ41ospo0mfoYRMjY RePHanchSqjPFqcmzYiX08kXGDJZtKkJTMA5VQbQVveH1kaSX5iAWaFK4JNI3p6uVc9h B7br0K0zSbwTWXMjtERVJvtJW4LRmrloqodlilvMZhrW+K4OW6I6mprU3X4laKw/LoPJ ILFuyhpwMKVRZmcMIuhRkWmhe4NdLQbq4i7DixapTM2WqyBKYNKCEhPmZPDqzp7xs3BW 0ZXw==
X-Received: by 10.180.8.4 with SMTP id n4mr22499089wia.13.1361248820773; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.8.4 with SMTP id n4mr22499081wia.13.1361248820644; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.244.13 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3684C634-B7B4-4DE2-82B4-CC97F00F6BB8@inria.fr>
References: <CAF1dMVFwfAc-q2zrF6nhTCvY=0wqZPzJj04dpU=WzTSDcuBQ9A@mail.gmail.com> <3684C634-B7B4-4DE2-82B4-CC97F00F6BB8@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF1dMVEUhng+nt2fdF+8hCmkQoQ=Z3dJN15TJ+27P-9SV5-nqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYNFMFO9mnCXTTCeUbgZVAtIctXEFAV2AVnPlmwJ2VpxMnWwJa5wj2C71VbMmRn2yIDJKrCCWuK3lmFwFd07XVXkdakNqwgvL1QLc0afAK/wA7JwKznv5gmgUqBD/1NMFbdDF/MI07qv1jCIIWxAL1QBBY0Q==
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rmt-fcast.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:40:30 -0000

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Document: draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07
>> Title: FCAST: Scalable Object Delivery for the ALC and NORM Protocols
>> Reviewer: Joseph Yee
>> Review Date: 2013-01-20
>> IETF Last Call Date: 2013-01-22
>> IESG Telechat Date: 2013-01-24
>>
>> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard
>>
>>
>> Major Issues:
>>    None
>>
>> Minor Issues:
>>
>>    It takes me awhile to understand the document, partly I think the
>> information flow is broken (another part is that I'm not familiar with
>> the subject).  If the principle section (Section 3) was followed by
>> Implementation section (Section 5) instead, I think it will be better
>> to reader.  IMHO, the order of FCAST Principles -> Requirement for
>> Compliant Implementation -> Security Consideration would be a better
>> flow.
>
> This order has been changed as proposed.
>
>> Nits:
>>    None, maybe a little xml comment to ask RFC Editors to help
>> reordering references based on RFC numbers :)
>
> Yes, using <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?> does the job.
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Vincent
>

Nice!

Joseph

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email