Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555153A6832; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZAgo1-lhwgj; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.252.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB313A67B4; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [12.235.168.194] (port=24774 helo=[172.16.1.5]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1LcrPJ-0004aW-3Z; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:54 -0800
Message-Id: <DC8E2F92-267F-46A5-AF85-EE2BCD676703@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <49A70452.9030903@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-122--307583572"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:20:54 -0500
References: <20090226181017.3328E3A6A6D@core3.amsl.com> <ca722a9e0902261259v3e09768bq325c46bfeb1141f3@mail.gmail.com> <49A70452.9030903@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:20:36 -0000

More than a +1: it is about time we got this out. For example, we  
would like to reference a document like this in the LEMONADE series of  
documents.

That said, this particular document is well written, gets the point  
across, and does the job nicely.

Of course, we could hold up publication for another three months, just  
so it can be an even five years since Dave submitted -00 :-(((((

On Feb 26, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:

> Lisa,
>
> I think this document is fairly well written, and I would support  
> its publication.
>
> Eliot
>
> On 2/26/09 9:59 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: The IESG<iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>> Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:10 AM
>> Subject: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail
>> Architecture)  to Proposed Standard
>> To: IETF-Announce<ietf-announce@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to  
>> consider
>> the following document:
>>
>> - 'Internet Mail Architecture '
>>   <draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to  
>> the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-03-26. Exceptionally,
>> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
>> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt
>>
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11811&rfc_flag=0
>>
>> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IETF-Announce mailing list
>> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apps-Discuss mailing list
>> Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Apps-Discuss mailing list
> Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss