IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06

"Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com> Sat, 26 January 2013 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ncamwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F2021F842C; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZ3eV50FpP0Y; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AD821F88D6; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:50:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1996; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359168612; x=1360378212; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sI2SCjZL8Nuv5xAffGlFMjXuDCNrnJPJm7K2aqDHAmE=; b=YEw9/OnEg0C0VDPPYlQlKSNNpWDFCLRwcQvdSVUoii+dNQGEZFFfOkDd 1yCKYZFG7WGLZpuqVYgoHaJrdnzRHMK/BOXYn+uEuViZdv3s4Lljw49Ce 21nF+9kDa1qI/0Eh0rEd8phrrQ+iO0yQIEwRi5F732AX5bs0AZH6+eJpp c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAAJEA1GtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFhka3I3YWc4IgAQQjEUUSAQgUBgIGIAIEMBUQAgQBDQUIiAcMrAaSSIEjjwkyYQOXKY8sgneCJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,542,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="168395143"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2013 02:50:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0Q2o0g2010626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.197]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:49:59 -0600
From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
Thread-Index: AQHN9OjE4LjtJY2ffE2xtLDK9PL1bJha1E6A
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:49:57 +0000
Message-ID: <B80278DF1B7C814184086F4A6ECB3115225DBDB3@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F850BC.8010203@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
x-originating-ip: [10.21.85.142]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CBCF0C35494D7D408B381126ACD5932E@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:44:31 -0800
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:50:13 -0000

Hi Alexey,

Many thanks for the review and apologies for the delayed response.

You are right, I was remiss in doing a full update when we switched to
include TEAP as the MTI method, so will move its reference to
normative….similarly, I will do the same for tls-unique.

Thanks again,
   Nancy.

On 1/17/13 11:27 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

>I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for
>this draft (for background on appsdir, please see ​
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate)
>.
>
>Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>you may receive.  Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
>or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
>Document: draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
>Title: PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods
>Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
>Review Date: 2013-01-17
>IETF Last Call Date: 2013-01-16
>IESG Telechat Date: unknown
>
>Summary:
>
>This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC, with
>some minor issues with references.
>
>Major Issues:
>   none
>
>Minor Issues:
>
>TEAP reference is normative, as it is mandatory-to-implement. (last
>sentence in 4.3). Also, is last sentence of 4.3 is contradicting the 2nd
>paragraph in Section 5?
>
>Similarly, tls-unique reference looks normative as well.
>
>Nits:
>  none

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email