Re: [apps-discuss] Webfinger discussion

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A64421F8802 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aNLho2cI5t0B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49E821F87FA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (dhcp-1108.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.17.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9528A1ECB420 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:47:10 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120327084709.GB11491@mail.yitter.info>
References: <053201cd0b5d$c08c80f0$41a582d0$@packetizer.com> <20120326150556.GC3557@mail.yitter.info> <CAA1s49V0M7N1pLua+ORxGWmsrd_yAA_KQ0Piqjg8VuWJ5=G+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA1s49V0M7N1pLua+ORxGWmsrd_yAA_KQ0Piqjg8VuWJ5=G+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Webfinger discussion
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:47:15 -0000

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:31:30PM -0400, Bob Wyman wrote:

> un-recommended!). If people did, in fact, use WebFinger to record such
> stuff, the concerns you mentioned would be relevant. Thus, it might make
> sense for the Security Considerations section to suggest that one should
> think carefully before using WebFinger to provide such dynamic information.

Right, that's most of what I was trying to say.  I do have a concern
that collecting a bunch of different information about a given person
and linking it together in a single, easy to access repository has
some potential security side effects (not just privacy ones, but those
too, of course) that are not clearly highlighted in the security
considerations.  I suppose one could argue that facebook's (or pick
your poison) user population shows nobody cares about that, but I
think it would still be good to have some observations about those
effects.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com