IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] text/yaml Re: [media-types] OpenApi media type registration questions

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA9612DAAD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:44:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9r2JSYYl4tW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC4C12D6FF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.133.70.129] (unknown [166.170.29.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8ECCC40228; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:44:10 -0600 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1457631851; bh=rvKzWr29LuN43klxhbwdLD0X77wrR7PENQ0w5eA71B0=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From; b=bSBiqk0Ma4RzClzOJ7lDY4KTC1FZqgsM5729PuoB7dQ+6C5GVGbrg3m0MTm8qvstl FZPkCPUjMasU3hNNWFdPuK3lJ5CMxfjyXDzolz4otO6Ny5SWkfry+spDbedzLAkHrE uPilKnDQ3plSxkXSicnhIon4Ria5X+AnnpGUMxXg=
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <ea43d611-9aac-494a-87ea-9d35bf37d0ff@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <SNT405-EAS138D1B69D14EDBB70D8B858A3B20@phx.gbl> <SNT405-EAS34588208A678723B2EDD9FA3B40@phx.gbl> <56E0CDBA.3050301@seantek.com> <4354120.g6DGuWIEuT@kitterma-e6430> <56E145FB.5010303@tzi.org> <ea43d611-9aac-494a-87ea-9d35bf37d0ff@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:37:06 -0500
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <DDB69FF7-DC9E-456D-A1A5-A385260AAEB5@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/89hve1JXDUp8Ga3f2FA_Op9YEQ8>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] text/yaml Re: [media-types] OpenApi media type registration questions
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:44:17 -0000


On March 10, 2016 9:01:00 AM EST, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:
>Why should the registration be specific to one version?
>
>I think the most widely used type with significantly different versions
>is 
>HTML. AFAICT, the text/html media type is used for all versions of HTML
>in 
>practice, https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/html seems
>to 
>permit that, and if it's been a major problem, I haven't noticed.
>
>Why is versioning more important to YAML than to HTML?

I wasn't sure if it was important or not.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email