Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7320 (4063)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 25 July 2014 20:43 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140725160421.A79231801A4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:43:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FFBA4C6E-4669-4F1B-8FF9-B091351F0415@mnot.net>
References: <20140725160421.A79231801A4@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/8jcO744VW5OdICrazNftHPYuURs
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, worley@ariadne.com, barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7320 (4063)
Precedence: list

This appears to be correct:
  http://w3-org.9356.n7.nabble.com/RFC-4395-should-replace-BCP-35-not-separate-BCP-td137454.html

But I note that RFC4395 *still* lists itself as BCP 115:
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395

*sigh*


On 25 Jul 2014, at 9:04 am, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7320,
> "URI Design and Ownership".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7320&eid=4063
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Dale Worley <worley@ariadne.com>
> 
> Section: 2.1 and 5.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Section 2.1 says "MUST do so by modifying [BCP115]".
> 
> Section 5.2 says
> 
>   [BCP115]   Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
>              Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", RFC 4395,
>              BCP 115, February 2006.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Section 2.1 should say "MUST do so by modifying [BCP35]".
> 
> Section 5.2 should say
> 
>   [BCP35]    Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
>              Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", RFC 4395,
>              BCP 35, February 2006.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> RFC 4395 is BCP 35, not BCP 115.  See the entry in bcp-index.txt:
> 
> 0115 [BCP number 115 is retired. It was mistakenly assigned to RFC
>     4395. RFC 4395 is BCP 35.]
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7320 (draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : URI Design and Ownership
> Publication Date    : July 2014
> Author(s)           : M. Nottingham
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Applications Area Working Group
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

[apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC732… RFC Errata System
Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RF… Mark Nottingham
Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RF… RFC Editor
[apps-discuss] [Errata Verified] RFC7320 (4063) RFC Errata System
Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RF… Dale R. Worley