IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Guidance on RFC 4627 as reference

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 19 September 2012 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3836721E80AB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2k1r9vJMJAY6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD1921E8042 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8JLZ1w4019063 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1348090505; bh=AbCs79+oa+zc2W8YOm3lZ1MC0crAgNG41dH3gzqNUfg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc; b=hfgaVBYHoDw6YFBgeBefObbZw6ahFddEE1/Nlc1DgEoTm6KQYrT8DdvsXIS01Q//p gWR1uFzk769ClWO8GNfYcbMffMNA9/keMio5dm4eIzvp6+A2BslHeaBvsAew129SRB 1DaUoIGfm9SMvIAW+F7wiZOGCUEaFRVln7cD/FTI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1348090505; i=@resistor.net; bh=AbCs79+oa+zc2W8YOm3lZ1MC0crAgNG41dH3gzqNUfg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc; b=oMUli1aUW5sZR72oyoPJzE9/oLGVs6GHGRes1mB+xEmDqaBwHpFPbPDnzJIGcdrov bwglDszr02rpFwKTgxPRnuniFoWunaxgHMI358Vc0QcuOPMnF38o02Yabg3xKlMerP EQNKQYe7ZMmJckjffVj6oBh97jY3xMwYsQc/6/MA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120919140051.0a168870@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:20:53 -0700
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVC5RMj_Z_kdcur47m9Tt7jPSTdeChaBozL94-wdxZ-DqA@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAAQiQRfcdFJ+8_DYnA+tMMu+U3Y7XnEeXszQDRGa4t6KYuokLA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwj0GavjVq6YBBhBAA9tDbDF5K6mQZ4bTSzPmeTzs05xfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVC5RMj_Z_kdcur47m9Tt7jPSTdeChaBozL94-wdxZ-DqA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Guidance on RFC 4627 as reference
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:35:07 -0000

At 06:11 18-09-2012, Barry Leiba wrote:
>Apart from that, Your Friendly ADs have been discussing the
>possibility of reclassifying it as Proposed Standard.  Comments about
>such a move are welcome on this thread.

There is an erratum.  A reclassification would require ignoring 
it.  I'd suggest a quick open and shut path.  My guess is that it 
might not be quick*.  The Security Considerations section of RFC 4627 
seems to be on the economical side.

Regards,
-sm

* JSON seems to be the IETF secret sauce these days.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email