[apps-discuss] Section 3.1 of draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-06 (was: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-06: (with COMMENT))

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Pete,

[removed iesg@ from the working group discussion]

At 19:24 06-08-2014, Pete Resnick wrote:
>And to be clear, my DISCUSS was because I thought the text was not 
>clear that 3.1.a and 3.1.b were being combined in X.7.20. Now the 
>text is clear that they are, which is why I moved off of my DISCUSS, 
>but that's not to say that I think it's good that they're combined. 
>Murray has argued that there has been no need to split them and 
>therefore there is no likely future need to do so either. The WG 
>should probably decide if that's true, because once you put X.7.20 
>in to mean the combination of 3.1.a and 3.1.b, there's no going 
>back; if you decide later that they ought to be split, you'll be 
>deprecating X.7.20 and making two new codes. I'd rather see them 
>split now, but it's not a showstopper, and if the WG considers it 
>and decides it's not necessary, like Stephen I will be fine with it.

I suggest that the working group considers the above points.  I'll 
wait for comments until end of Friday (this week).

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)