Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme from "Provisional" to "Historic"
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 15 September 2010 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561943A69A5 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.808, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9whWlc5JMD3i for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382D3A68FE for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8FFiUO2057102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:44:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p062408d9c8b69a457d5a@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <4C90E4CA.2070201@isode.com>
References: <4C90B0E4.5080502@isode.com> <nfh196hdj8q6a9u7icil6segc7qmnmc24p@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <4C90E4CA.2070201@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:44:28 -0700
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme from "Provisional" to "Historic"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:44:12 -0000
At 4:22 PM +0100 9/15/10, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > >>* Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>>RFC 1738, Section 4 says: >>> >>> mailserver Access to data available from mail servers. >>> >>>That is all it says. I don't believe this URI scheme is well defined and I also don't believe that it was ever deployed (corrections to the last statement are welcomed). >>> >>>Any objections of declaring this Historic? >>> >>> >>I note that http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/uri/historical.html sort of >>did that already. (And I am intrigued by "An SGML-based URC Service".) >> >I suppose I need to double check with Paul. I didn't know he tried to standardize it. > >>(Wouldn't uri-review@ietf.org or uri@w3.org be a better place to ask?) >> >Ok, Sent to the former. >But I think discussing this topic here is also appropriate. Nuke it. No one could come up with examples of it being used, much less interoperably. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium
- [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme fro… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Moving "mailserver" URI scheme… Martin J. Dürst