Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00.txt
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 07:22 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2BB21F85D7; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:22:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oBBSc6aSJp+R; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2936821F85BE; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com with SMTP id uz6so15436097obc.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:22:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UPU82IJYU4fsGp66+H2pG9fvDJPN95oosgQ+Ma8BUZc=; b=pXtjXTj3gG0UVWtHrFtb+qXnWEBvpVAR+22gH6NMNJBh+i5X5b2++9dt4XE87ZJ/dg 1pIojjdKOa3dPr/h8YlIsd+cOSLs1iBTqhhxati1cMACiUjlgv02JMhRj2SMyEcjaB3v Tl2b41CwyIcLE6eZNK4c05Bo4bmAy50XR64Cc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.15.104 with SMTP id w8mr47526399obc.20.1325661753018; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.30.167 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:22:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120103235905.13595.45789.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120103235905.13595.45789.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:22:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CADBvc99Zavjgku+_XYeF6XF0AhOYcZikgUbpn1ArXS=3d1Evwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:22:33 -0000
Hello, I wonder why these two docs (JSON Patch and JSON Pointer) both have the Intended status 'Standards Track' whereas RFC 4627, that specifies JSON and is the core specification is Informational. Or do we want 'standardize' JSON - than we could produce 4627bis as PS, and include these proposals in such a document. Mykyta Yevstifeyev 2012/1/4 <internet-drafts@ietf.org>: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : JSON Patch > Author(s) : Paul C. Bryan > Filename : draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2012-01-03
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-jso… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov