IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 03 December 2009 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65E33A68CC for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.035, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmvba7No1dv7 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B697B3A6826 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Dec 2009 12:20:39 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.105]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 03 Dec 2009 13:20:39 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Z/rRpIm0ZJg/CZEOVm3wHqTK6DX3VkNajduD/MC 4Xzj+GH4CF7ioF
Message-ID: <4B17AD11.3000205@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:20:33 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Keane <pkeane@mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress
References: <5FFC5BD4-0CC6-4168-B91D-5D26E1402DC1@mnot.net> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785209F9C@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <D536054A-3BA2-4E52-AA16-C7FF5E0855E7@mnot.net> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234378520A45C@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <8158ad750912022152g645b53a3k57e1e328e0dffb23@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8158ad750912022152g645b53a3k57e1e328e0dffb23@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.64
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0000

Peter Keane wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com 
> <mailto:eran@hueniverse.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I disagree.
> 
>     You define two classes of relations types and explain their syntax.
>     But you then make the registration part a SHOULD. It is not clear if
>     the SHOULD is about the need to register short names, or a guidance
>     on when to consider not using an extension and registering instead.
> 
>     As for removing the extension type, there are still plenty of cases
>     when a relation type is so specific, it should not be registered.
> 
> 
> +1 (re: v. specific rel types that ought not be registered)
> 
> --peter keane

Absolutely.

BR, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email