Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-05: (with DISCUSS)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 05 August 2014 04:28 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242E41B284A; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yACZsSbkL0FG; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3213D1B280F; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b13so344112wgh.6 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xw9I9oP3UkJWvPaij2SIeGvQMr3LrohJqdWMgwpdqhk=; b=bAqp+BbEEeh5ONLudPn7P7wxKDYL2O3nbSFQVpdFmXIT5n12woKnTv0stYCWneHDX5 Ga7PDvUWBGG5IbPngkM8sn6fQcpZo+bFO9sIdJcNXFbavurCqP0tODiJtGPyLw1g1p36 WaddJ9WUlbjEQqmBfalapyVeuhSCMPonLdpZ1vi2KYOsd5Mxf5Kxm4jxQcfglzXJXHwm /R+J4UaOA/U7uwybIx/ddzaCNZG7XtUiT2QL0TCiEaumutGSs4p17cYLcXKOkgRN0S3Y jxd7WPFZj/r58mjXoH/dmiaFftwqiNKxEkRqTN/7KjKPQkPm6zTzu/JyiEyxm/M0kXl/ snVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.38.39 with SMTP id d7mr2892142wik.24.1407212927429; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.10.99 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 21:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53E05CF1.9000102@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20140805013510.3778.62099.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwby0q+VQOKYgJigXw4J1jheBgOqODY48m-VocuYKSfM5g@mail.gmail.com> <53E05B7A.5060308@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwaTffcOiXMpCybuzX-j01VgxczS7PSmKbNtOGtSgVYdiQ@mail.gmail.com> <53E05CF1.9000102@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:28:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbWi1s3w5iXJ3wuc5Z8T+UqMaWP20fQn_rZa3rQ9-XWwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f646fcfa9b18d04ffda4abf"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/JXfQtVEcJu7KgcHPXXuzM9QQP3g
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:28:51 -0000

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
wrote:

>
> Much clearer. I'll remove my DISCUSS in the morning, unless Barry wants me
> to leave it for housekeeping purposes; I'll assume that you all can decide
> on the specifics. Thanks for DISCUSSing it.
>
>
Likewise, I'm happy to post the update to the tracker now or wait until
after the telechat.  I'll assume the latter unless directed otherwise.

-MSK