[apps-discuss] Another use case for a per-recipient header field: Opened IESG discussions

[Alessandro Vesely <[e-mail]>]

I like that new feature of posting IESG positions CC to the WG mailing
list.  It eases navigation through posts about a given I-D, making ML
archives more complete.

Monday, Pete said it is a matter of waiting ten minutes instead of five
before replying to such posts.  That is often implicit in the header:
Recipients in the "To:" field are expected to reply soon, while those in
"Cc:" may want to think twice.  The only problem is when there are so
many different kinds of recipients that they can hardly be grouped into
two groups (three, if you count Bcc:).  That issue can be solved with a
new header field, similar in syntax to RRVS.  E.g.:

Think-Before-Reply:  [e-mail]; 10 minutes