[apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-03.txt> (The 'acct' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 20 February 2013 22:10 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3F921E8044 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2qDGDTp9DcN; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7E621E8041; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IANA <drafts-lastcall@icann.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.40
X-IETF-Draft-string: draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri
X-IETF-Draft-revision: 03
Message-ID: <20130220221040.25795.82511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:40 -0800
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-03.txt> (The 'acct' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: noreply@ietf.org
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:10:41 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Applications Area Working Group WG (appsawg) to consider the following document: - 'The 'acct' URI Scheme' <draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-03.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-03-06. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines the 'acct' URI scheme as a way to identify a user's account at a service provider, irrespective of the particular protocols that can be used to interact with the account. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.