Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-02.txt

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 22 October 2012 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E818A1F0C49 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0p9nlXKFxC4z for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293D1F042B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (dhcp-222-230.meetings.nanog.org [199.187.222.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 130EC8A031 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:00:38 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:00:30 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20121022220029.GA50793@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <20121022211516.15926.49394.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121022211516.15926.49394.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:00:40 -0000

Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:15:16PM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> Filename:	 draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert
> Revision:	 02
> Title:		 Asserting DNS Administrative Boundaries Within DNS Zones
> Creation date:	 2012-10-22
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 19
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-02.txt

After the positive feedback in the last IETF meeting, and after some
useful comments from John Klensin, I updated this draft.  It now
contains a discussion of two different approaches: the scheme-and-port
that was in the -01 version, and the names-only approach that I tried
in the -00 version (but which got quite a lot of negative feedback
from the browser development community).  Thoughts are welcome.  If
this work is to proceed at all, this issue needs to be decided.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com