Re: [apps-discuss] RFC3023: Is note about HTTP Accept header wrong
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 01 September 2011 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC01921F986C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.689, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUHEUHjC+2md for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C81EF21F972C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Sep 2011 16:03:53 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-186-089.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO HIVE) [94.223.186.89] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 01 Sep 2011 18:03:53 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19pQRIqnIRpQez0RQ//1Iy6IfBz8SEBBCSUOgxMVR kNXzyiwchwe2qp
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Raphael Bossek <raphael.bossek@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:03:54 +0200
Message-ID: <m2bv575ikf74la62vj3hi446j75gpao0u3@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CABwmVOzQ1kMX1jJKZPWj_TW_V=pzZV4y1PB4+6j7+SM6K6OxQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABwmVOzQ1kMX1jJKZPWj_TW_V=pzZV4y1PB4+6j7+SM6K6OxQQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC3023: Is note about HTTP Accept header wrong
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:02:22 -0000
* Raphael Bossek wrote: >Study the RFC 3023 found the following note that seams to be incorrect >for me. Here the note at page 17 >(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3023#page-17): > >NOTE: Section 14.1 of HTTP[RFC2616] does not support Accept >headers of the form "Accept: */*+xml" and so this header MUST NOT >be used in this way. >Where is my mistake? The assumption is that the second `*` above would be treated as a wild- card rather than as part of the type name. That is not the case with RFC 2616, so `*+xml` refers to one subtype and not many. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- [apps-discuss] RFC3023: Is note about HTTP Accept… Raphael Bossek
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC3023: Is note about HTTP Ac… Bjoern Hoehrmann