IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Reviews, please (was Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-02.txt)

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019CA1ADF86 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:43:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iidTY4w5PKK5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:43:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0881ADF23 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:43:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a1so6469784wgh.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:43:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=M7FUa5H//OM6CSqkO0dzaA9cXb4r7oPInikHo9Y049o=; b=SP+44r0Gjz/Meq475MUoVrFeaY+6hvwym+fcaEwTQqZIaKLnAMhN4rbmgw9Z0QDwXL yLE3KNuxVjhV7KzLVIgpXd0+sO8XpsFRYhjegVlH1alY9zxx8ywx0XyGC4Smn0lPaIFg 6OYepdV4BW9A4hnPYr5CrHy14iQCSysJB7dddlLaNHisv8rM2kResNWruJLJM8i6RoMQ m4+OpvRh2JRKfq9YZuKEUuSN9Fz46OmEYEAOnoWad43tviqzAMUYq9+YA18hjZ1K9B/m A/YQPPVLe8adjUQUbhX5xOpCnDnBpyPAWSQ6KSowBmNYzLJSr/fPJM9WfczhLG2pyuYr 17Xg==
X-Received: by 10.194.59.240 with SMTP id c16mr22104195wjr.13.1386132207610; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:43:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.221.133 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:43:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYfN858Gvt41ZtGc7raw31jnPKKgoCJ6MuYNtgDDp6USw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYfN858Gvt41ZtGc7raw31jnPKKgoCJ6MuYNtgDDp6USw@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:43:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbepiGBM-vA5yF7Rs-Hvg0FYoTDn_aZyOy313ikj3rzm0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Reviews, please (was Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 04:43:33 -0000

I will take another pass at addressing James M's comments later on
this week. I want to wrap this one up also.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Manger, James H
> <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> Title:           JSON Merge Patch
>> >> Htmlized:
>> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-02
>> >> Abstract:
>> >>    This specification defines the JSON merge patch format and
>> >> processing
>> >>    rules.
>>
>> > Based on feedback. Fairly significant editorial update and one key
>> > technical change. This updates the media type registration to follow
>> > the +json naming policy on the media type (that is,
>> > application/json-merge-patch becomes application/merge-patch+json).
>>
>> Most of these changes are great: title, media type, organization.
>>
>> I feel there are still issues (in addition to the outstanding issuing in
>> my last call comments):
>>
>> [...]
>
>
> Could we get a few more reviews or comments in support of advancing this
> document?  We'd really like to get this one moving, but we can't without
> some indication that there's consensus support for doing so.
>
> -MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email