[apps-discuss] Regarding draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 23 May 2012 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A3C21F8748 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zN7ZEnFaO1qS for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5721F8747 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id DVS91j0010ZaKgw01VSAgS; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:26:10 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=eMmRfQV1 c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=FPkMrB8BJmkA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=b6nfwRhkAAAA:8 a=mV3yvF7_1jgUF62-tSYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=1XeHX7Y41ikCB91zyIgA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:26:09 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
Thread-Index: Ac05CSRcFtfb9pcJRhuu9LG/SdaVAA==
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:26:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812D477@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812D477exchmbx901corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1337793970; bh=E4HspvEFrP9uPVBc1af6Md+qPKJIF2nvN+A1boBoNFM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=vQRf0y45YVgur5BJ1W/SrOnVL3X4DyVFQ+YTqEh6zt6MkTGEechPtNGgYYduUhjdE V0uD6DwPQcPqBGfS4X6dXJTIJ7wBo9m3SayDLIEQ1FRE769c2w6B69nkaIEE+0evWA /hO7urr6yCBI1ZlG1zQyH7qUzThieTABMHHjVriw=
Subject: [apps-discuss] Regarding draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:26:25 -0000

This draft has completed an IETF Last Call, with some comments received for consideration and integration into the document.  Unfortunately, the authors have advised me that they will not have time in the next couple of months (at least) to complete the edits so that it can go to the IESG.

I have (gratefully!) appointed SM as the new document editor.  He has agreed to fold in the Last Call comments so that we can progress the document to publication.  I expect we should see a review of the LC comments from him and a new version shortly.

Thanks, SM!

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair