[apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-hansen-mdn-3798bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E71A03C1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFe2ZAswweNH for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99F11A00CA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8so6727989wiw.12 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=p+tILPfzv7zKbAqlCd053l53yKd86sjY9mPAjzR16jE=; b=jzyVNE5SbtvpOZkjOo189T4w6QfcxAuewXV0Iz9iMcS5+guTJWDqfhyUrxBBY8vI73 b+ac7QdVOgQVf3XiKGF93HYkYNmeuLrBt1PGln+YDZ8QPJJ1UhdF4Of3cbpkpJApZmS5 vFLYsl8FplP69umb3QUr7L5E6S67N8AJtm2QIBcuP3bMKjfIQy3sqzRdAQUZ/UeglmOR 4hJlEOk1R921CJ6zRtOIguoQGuuOtorj83qqu2QTjv68lESFddby6SsOpQGE0Zvi2lIO ehZYec9OoxF/natjoQgE6FscmBZiqrM4sSp86WGj2oFLLSJJgAkx2hADeSuYE2V7WaBB AuHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.186.178 with SMTP id fl18mr37273473wjc.83.1406064157466; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.10.99 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwacaNmW1FBuUWO6p4hQHFb-j6LNbWpt_LR_Kpi-X9synA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04dd2a324cf04feced21c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/UVRzsp2kj9OR4ZOmOj14fLYjNFk
Subject: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-hansen-mdn-3798bis
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:22:40 -0000

Call For Adoption: draft-hansen-mdn-3798bis

Colleagues,

This note begins a Call For Adoption for the above document to be adopted
as an APPSAWG working group item.  The Call ends on August 8, 2014.

Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document as-is
is ready for publication.  It is merely acceptance of the document as a
starting point for what will be some later final product of APPSAWG.  The
working group is free to make changes to the document according to the
normal consensus process.

There was some favorable discussion toward adoption of this document at
IETF 90 in Toronto.  We will factor this into the decision at the close of
this Call.

Since this document includes Alexey as co-author, I will be making the call
about this Call, and selecting the shepherd.

Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition,
preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item of
APPSAWG (as opposed to some other venue).  Feel free to include discussion
of constraints that the WG should consider with respect to its mini-charter.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair