Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01.txt
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 16 July 2012 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CC11E819D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUBJkDITb83O for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com (dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4906D11E814E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA2D12D09E4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com
Received: from dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bd8m2uU2Dpwv for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dyn.com (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) by dynmail-01-mht.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 283E712D09E1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:41 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120716212141.GP96149@dyn.com>
References: <20120716204725.9601.71787.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120716204725.9601.71787.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:21:00 -0000
Dear colleagues, On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:47:25PM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > Filename: draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert > Revision: 01 > Title: Asserting DNS Administrative Boundaries Within DNS Zones > Creation date: 2012-07-16 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 16 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01 > Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01 I uploaded a revision of the above draft; the -00 was discussed on this list some time ago. This version attempts to deal with a number of concerns people raised. Other highlights: * Changed the mnemonic from BOUND to AREALM * Added ports and scheme to the RRTYPE * Added some motivating text and suggestions about what can be done with the new RRTYPE * Removed use of "origin" term, because it was confusing. The document filename preserves "origin" in the name in order that the tracker doesn't lose the change history, but that's just a vestige. * Removed references to cross-document information sharing and ECMAScript. I don't understand the issues there, but Maciej Stachowiak convinced me that they're different enough that this mechanism probably won't work. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for d… Andrew Sullivan
- [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-asser… John C Klensin