Re: [apps-discuss] IETF LC for DANE
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 12 April 2012 03:59 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3E611E80B2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxoTpOdLR9Qc for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5446711E80B1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (unknown [216.17.175.160]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E8E140058; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:13:16 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4F865313.5040304@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:59:15 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <B2683C8B-C5D0-4AB4-AE0C-8B8E4268BA2F@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B2683C8B-C5D0-4AB4-AE0C-8B8E4268BA2F@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF LC for DANE
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:59:24 -0000
On 4/11/12 9:01 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > The TLSA protocol from the DANE WG has just entered IETF Last Call: > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg10138.html> > > This may be of particular interest to Apps folks because the > protocol is aimed at apps that use TLS, and expects them to do more > than they are doing now in exchange for a different (and presumably > much better) security model. Murray already did a bang-up job on his > AppsDir review, but more Last Call comments are welcome from > everyone. Thanks for the heads-up. I know a few folks who plan to review it during Last Call, me included. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF LC for DANE Peter Saint-Andre
- [apps-discuss] IETF LC for DANE Paul Hoffman