[apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-acct-uri to working group document?

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Fri, 03 August 2012 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FCC21F8E23 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.794
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.794 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.196, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaOptfT9QPiU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AC221F8E19 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail49-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.225) by CO1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.243.66.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:21 +0000
Received: from mail49-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D414A03C5; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 0
X-BigFish: VS0(zzc85fhzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah107ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail49-co1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail49-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1344013459838891_13303; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.243]) by mail49-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17A0480044; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by CO1EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (10.243.66.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:18 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.222]) by TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.80.67]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:04:18 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-saintandre-acct-uri to working group document?
Thread-Index: Ac1xmgJoVAvN6lBvTgy4wckLNeiPGA==
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:04:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366751E1D@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.35]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366751E1DTK5EX14MBXC285r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-acct-uri to working group document?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:04:23 -0000

Is it time for Peter to submit draft-saintandre-acct-uri as a working group document?

                                                            -- Mike