[apps-discuss] A draft about delay limits for real-time services

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Wed, 16 December 2015 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434511A0856 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PybFP2bFhxKU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5581A03A3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id tBGGJIVu012033; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:19:18 +0100
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:19:26 +0100
Message-ID: <010f01d1381d$888d6570$99a83050$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0110_01D13825.EA535410"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdE4HHz7udC6IFP2Qby55sXu88HW7A==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/ag_uOXS3IsJ80aqB6gvLzVL5SvA>
Cc: 'Mirko Sužnjević' <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>
Subject: [apps-discuss] A draft about delay limits for real-time services
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:19:38 -0000

Hi all,
 
We have submitted this draft:
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-dispatch-delay-limits/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-dispatch-delay-limits/ 
 
It surveys a set of recommendations about the maximum latency tolerated by
the users of services with delay constraints. Some recommendations already
exist for e.g. VoIP, but emerging services as e.g. online gaming, have
different requirements.
 
Different papers in the literature reporting these constraints are surveyed,
and a summary of the latency limits for each service is provided.
 
The draft has been adapted from a more specific one, which was submitted
some time ago to the Transport Area WG (
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf/>
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf/). The
current version is more general, and not specific for the case of traffic
optimization with multiplexing.
 
We have first submitted it to the Dispatch WG, and the advice we have
received is that we could ask in appsawg. The proposal does not aim to
propose any new WG, and it is related to real-time applications as e.g. VoIP
or online games. As said in the charter, "The Applications Area sometimes
receives proposals for the development of specifications dealing with
application-related topics that are not in scope for an existing working
group and do not justify the formation of a new working group."
 
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Jose Saldana & Mirko Suznjevic