IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] pls note that invitation for tomorrow's VDI call will be announced to apps-discuss@ietf.org only.

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 20 May 2011 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEFFE0722 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIC9PD3BXm+Y for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D1CE0713 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com [64.101.72.158]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBF940046; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:41:02 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DD68B8D.9090405@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:41:01 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
References: <095c01cc0b51$e005ba30$a0112e90$@olddog.co.uk> <BANLkTimaM_CEN-4s59ejWv_LG9kgkmpMPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimaM_CEN-4s59ejWv_LG9kgkmpMPw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010508040000090009010203"
Cc: "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] pls note that invitation for tomorrow's VDI call will be announced to apps-discuss@ietf.org only.
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:41:03 -0000

<hat type='AD'/>

Bhumip, if you are holding closed design team calls then do not
advertise them on this list. I strongly suggest that you create your own
dedicated list for the design team, e.g. using one of the free
discussion list services on the Internet. Notices and minutes of closed
design team calls are not appropriate for open IETF discussion lists.

On 5/5/11 7:27 PM, Bhumip Khasnabish wrote:
> For tomorrow's mtg., we plan to hold a discussion among the VDI related
> drafts' (existing/proposed) authors/contributors. Thanks.
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk
> <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:
> 
>     What is the status of this call?
> 
>     Is it a closed Design Team call, or an open call for any IETF
>     participant?
> 
>      
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email