IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Publication request:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Tue, 17 May 2011 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F93E073C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuMsqvd9dl1S for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EBDE06B0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1305654026; x=1337190026; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4DD2B306.9060702@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Tu e,=2017=20May=202011=2012:40:22=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Jiankang=20YAO=20<yaojk@cnnic. cn>|CC:=20<appsawg-ads@tools.ietf.org>,=20<apps-discuss@i etf.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20[apps-discuss]=20Publication=20 request:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04|References:=20<E6AAD60 30561426DA7A544970F2B77AF@LENOVO47E041CF>|In-Reply-To:=20 <E6AAD6030561426DA7A544970F2B77AF@LENOVO47E041CF> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.39.5]; bh=zg+JWii6oI5clnJU7fR3Cz30cBs1N57gPq0iYYo0H4E=; b=Kq7jaKPz74gS7/gxjo0w2HdVI6hB9jiAE/JCOHUaIIDXaFLhsdahcrT8 fcxRgunfxW29bGr6DGbdW2jlGWK7OTXLJ9Ke/70inc0iDI119npKuuhxK USOUhC6Tjd/QPhX9C/OyPRO+OamS7+LnyrlnqdclCJCcRBLZqe4+qVcqU Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6349"; a="91862248"
Received: from ironmsg02-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.16]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 17 May 2011 10:40:24 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,225,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="105369368"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 May 2011 10:40:24 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:40:24 -0700
Message-ID: <4DD2B306.9060702@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:40:22 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
References: <E6AAD6030561426DA7A544970F2B77AF@LENOVO47E041CF>
In-Reply-To: <E6AAD6030561426DA7A544970F2B77AF@LENOVO47E041CF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: appsawg-ads@tools.ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Publication request:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:40:26 -0000

On 5/16/11 10:11 PM, Jiankang YAO wrote:
>    (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it
>          represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
>          others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
>          agree with it?
>
> Many WG participants from IDNAbis and APPSAWG have reviewed this document and
>   had reasonably strong WG consensus.
>    

I'd like at least some discussion here (and probably in the Technical 
Summary for the announcement) of the issue explained by Simon: There was 
at least some controversy and discussion as to whether U+19DA  should be 
made BackwardCompatible. I agree that eventually both WGs came to 
concensus, but I think you should document the issue and its result, 
since it was pretty central.

Other than that, this looks good. Once I have your update, I'll post the 
Last Call.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email