IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-08.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEA921F8B6B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:55:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QScS+CjZbWYW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6BF21F8B3B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-12) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 591b9905.0.966332.00-336.2657022.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5099b196626e3c7c-e2d6577385788ae0e8478d686c1c972742b9d085
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA70tnS8013391 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:55:49 -0500
Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA70tiO2013387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:55:45 -0500
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:55:30 -0500
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA70tUgp026052 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:55:30 -0500
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA70tLTi025873 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:55:25 -0500
Received: from [130.10.161.202] (vpn-130-10-161-202.vpn.mwst.att.com[130.10.161.202]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20121107005544gw1006323re> (Authid: tony); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:55:45 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [130.10.161.202]
Message-ID: <5099B177.5090506@att.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:55:19 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
References: <20121105155412.4054.20989.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f5bmwyv9hgs.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <f5bmwyv9hgs.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080506060503000605090805"
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=KI7t+i5o c=1 sm=0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=CaNOsgFdgDQA:10 a=T3ddMRUbpJkA:10 a=q6fm-fMmBdMA:10 a=ofM]
X-AnalysisOut: [gfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=fK92HPE7]
X-AnalysisOut: [l_oA:10 a=9Mr3Ubm-oeqgL2HLH-gA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=aA-rk]
X-AnalysisOut: [ObNAAAA:8 a=4_NUV46K6sX02w-Ty3oA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=pBY]
X-AnalysisOut: [l5yfJOqKrBx6p:21]
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-08.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:55:51 -0000

On 11/6/2012 5:02 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> internet-drafts writes:
>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>   This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> 	Title           : Additional Media Type Structured Syntax Suffixes
>> 	Author(s)       : Tony Hansen
>>                            Alexey Melnikov
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-08.txt
> Given that
>
>    draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00
>
> has now been published, is the patch to RFC3023 in section 4 of this
> document really necessary?
>
> ht

Yes;  drafts have no official status. Also, 
draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-08.txt is already in the 
RFC-EDITOR queue. When draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes gets published as an 
RFC, it will then be considered an update to both RFC3023 and the RFC 
that draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs becomes. Also, 
draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes will need to incorporate the registration 
form for +xml.

     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email