IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] AD sponsoring draft-masotta-tftpexts-windowsize-opt-09

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 19 March 2014 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC601A042E; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2cFwR1jy965O; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B147B1A02F5; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2JHA0Bt014937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5329CF68.80104@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:10:00 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk, barryleiba@computer.org
References: <53222FC1.7040009@bogus.com> <532367CA.4080807@isi.edu> <53247DCD.40002@bogus.com> <53249F15.7010802@isi.edu> <0f9fb6b8c92609346c3a4111f2c31349.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <532870D8.4090106@bogus.com> <53288174.6050209@isi.edu>, <CAC4RtVCnHd6UPDChmu+ge_LV+FD9RyAjkbTtjeMWXd2=hZAT2A@mail.gmail.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E6334792@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E6334792@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/eoEnKK4hnt8bIvQEq2vkIwXq7Tc
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] AD sponsoring draft-masotta-tftpexts-windowsize-opt-09
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:11:47 -0000

On 3/18/2014 3:01 PM, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> Having said that, I think the draft is silly, the appeal was silly, AD
> sponsorship is silly. Limited TSVWG resources are better spent elsewhere.

+1, but our collective private opinion should not affect whether a WG 
sees a doc.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email