IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-01.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 02 July 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FC921F9C06 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7bVFTbmMKEp for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F037521F9BCF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.15.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1a613d15.0.7788827.00-489.21723249.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:06:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 51d316a15a1783bb-15d5ad66f73ab9af598fd1eedbeec2ae1c398b5e
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r62I6PAq000800 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:06:25 -0400
Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r62I6JTZ000759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:06:20 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:06:02 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r62I61Rc002752 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:06:02 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r62I5rgZ002505 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:05:55 -0400
Received: from [135.70.247.111] (vpn-135-70-247-111.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.247.111]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20130702180553gw100bhhf3e> (Authid: tony); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:05:53 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.247.111]
Message-ID: <51D31689.1050900@att.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:06:01 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20130528150820.16413.98334.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f5bwqqjruux.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <f5bsj17rqzj.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <f5ba9m5ja1b.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <nuq5t8d0ej7ljlqjop7a70t6meqokt0m2n@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <f5b1u7hj6pf.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <f5b1u7hj6pf.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=A9DbydqG c=1 sm=0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=ErclZcP0gggA:10 a=3ukmKKXcZEAA:10 a=BxYK8I4q7hEA:10 a=ofM]
X-AnalysisOut: [gfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zQP7CpK]
X-AnalysisOut: [OAAAA:8 a=Z21_oMWbUr8A:10 a=JEF8CjgGHCqb_M3XvCgA:9 a=wPNLv]
X-AnalysisOut: [fGTeEIA:10 a=_7TtuFm0MZIA:10 a=NJhTYNpwtyMA:10]
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:06:33 -0000

On 7/2/2013 11:57 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>>    *HST: What do we do about the registration of +xml in RFC6839?  I
>>    think we need to reproduce it with appropriate changes, as it
>>    currently references 3023, and can be simplified/clarified by
>>    including it here.  . .*
>>
>> Including that in the document and updating RFC6839 accordingly does
>> seem to be a good way forward.
> OK -- any one else concur?

Yes, I agree.

    Tony Hansen
    RFC 6839 co-author

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email