IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 06 November 2013 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B689521E8175 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:56:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dmoJWu1fMZNc for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E3B21E80CF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so10452437obc.26 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:56:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3Gj+4yhf10hgaO3JI8d4MIpL8Z2dLOq/iIWWE75POyU=; b=1DcIZR2gBjag9oejmcz1euKJBlKTPBjM8guET4Zcdjna6dpAm7JBP/P5QR5Vb0Y1OQ RU8wXuG9cQ63EURRJeaYdsMfmxRE4lS2IFsDcrR+u3H+b3wLrwKTSkoP3NTI5gann7NN vJA8+FRM98W4KrfHdW9z8hn4luGBB3AwAYigbyq2C/iyB4zwZMHQnrGmGYRmyxSurm/1 BG2xgUq8RAtzvuS7isTEk4vm/zHysunIivo6HpbWteLIDqzIHCwS3ssoWIpEYCEN9Ul/ 4TmqT7Vrx5c/qBnfd27i6NEZFj8wvPrnSwkI9vAmvcdBC6SfQ5WHrse6SIdhPHc1YHuo LxGw==
X-Received: by 10.182.246.39 with SMTP id xt7mr4073102obc.16.1383767795761; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:56:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.124.137 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:56:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <527A8AF3.4000304@gmx.de>
References: <CABP7RbdB9Hh77JjO+xhcdGqGjTpuzxbKBEWbonnwYwPDeFYd8A@mail.gmail.com> <E46AB09D-0D7C-4275-8050-2F7DAD49B52A@mnot.net> <CABP7Rbfy7aT+fccH97BsXoprsCyAkFp_Un0H8yHhrd=bpBtpVQ@mail.gmail.com> <5279952E.5040402@gmx.de> <CABP7RbcM5TPantd7CLxjYGxRbMxcbrZJJu36xMB5EwT_qO8qhQ@mail.gmail.com> <527997D3.4010108@gmx.de> <CABP7RbdSqdb8Pf0QnOJ6k=wJeUOFFKG8BGd_=ULCqgFWZLFLEw@mail.gmail.com> <527999EA.9050401@gmx.de> <CABP7Rbdu1R_XS4SL7xNDOjgcTGfrax_X2oj3RRYqw0X+ArVEfw@mail.gmail.com> <527A5C23.8050201@gmx.de> <CABP7Rbe5=v8uK9W2YJgxvQKG=Gue1=iYCdAQ1JiK0qg+LC2Q5Q@mail.gmail.com> <527A61E8.2050309@gmx.de> <CABP7RbcFZg6x1SKXjZ3ePeDsvqpt8D7-uojB-RME+yvdAy8-oA@mail.gmail.com> <527A74C3.3010506@gmx.de> <CABP7RbdJs0DxTwEX65wt5UjF3=KV+eb6jKF0wpBY5cd16rJ_5A@mail.gmail.com> <527A84ED.3080208@gmx.de> <CABP7Rbf0tfXiABAZoQOQ31XunCiiGfYjDasaCKK0BJtZN3bg0A@mail.gmail.com> <527A8AF3.4000304@gmx.de>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:56:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfADN8U5bff7hMvPLf8E_oB+GzjTSm1t8izov7XeHK0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:56:36 -0000

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-link-method-07.txt

Per Julian's suggestion, accommodates all target attributes, deals
with 2xx response codes, handles use of the anchor attribute to
override the context IRI. Also, deals with equivalence checking for
IRIs.

- James

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2013-11-06 10:21, James M Snell wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
>> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see the material difference.
>>>
>>> If the client has no reliable way to find out what links are there it'll
>>> be
>>> essentially restricted to edit those that it created itself.
>>>
>>> It seems that this is the issue that needs to be addressed.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This is not a problem I intend to solve... largely because I have no
>> need to solve it. For one set of use cases I have, there is no need to
>> discover established links, and for the remaining set, the data
>> formats used already have ways of exposing whatever links the server
>> wishes to expose.
>>
>> That said, have a concrete suggestion?
>
>
> Maybe have a keyword for the "Prefer" header field that instructs the server
> to return *all* links upon GET?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email