Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?)
"William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> Wed, 01 July 2009 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F863A6CFB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQ+ZRGc5BLor for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca [IPv6:2001:410:9000:127::10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F181B3A67D9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n61JrqVe001727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:53:57 -0400
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n61JrqaZ001724 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:53:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:53:52 -0400
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907011537130.11066@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:54:13 -0000
All, Over the past several months a colleague at a university and myself have revived work on the WU-FTPD daemon. Through researching the various RFCs and such, it's become apparent that there are a small number of drafts as well as a potential number of others that could significantly contribute to the protocol. (So my voyage has gone from operator, developer and implementor to protocol spec.) But, ftpext wound-up and it seems there's no specific venue to flesh these out amongst like-minded FTP people. I suppose what I'm looking for from the Apps Area folk is to test the waters on establishing a BoF (if I have read the Apps website correctly) that will lead to establishing some kind of group that will further the possible work remaining or possibly poending to be done, or not. Discussions amongst a couple of authors of long-expired drafts seem to favour some kind of venue. Thanks, wfms
- Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) William F. Maton Sotomayor
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) tom.petch
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) William F. Maton Sotomayor
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) John C Klensin
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) William F. Maton Sotomayor
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) William F. Maton Sotomayor
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) John C Klensin
- Re: Interest in reviving WG on FTP(maybe ext?) John C Klensin