[apps-discuss] dispatch vs. apps-discuss (was Re: Regular Expressions for Internet Mail Identifiers (draft-seantek-mail-regexen))

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 09 June 2016 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092C912D989 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01GJJ5BFSCQ7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE0C12D696 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g20so47691870ywb.0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dVq4Gc4qhVun03fHlgLABWXya4Orq813sAUlXi8mHKs=; b=PTs/0j3wre1pgsLNrDKdSID1vOd3Wr6EL9WzmR0v8W32FxSobQ2NIBgLDxWkppw511 MaupnTbd484kmcsMXcDN/z21T5U/mchfs/Yg7dTiXIupqYPpfBCrFErsQTM4DLuhWeiu oVT/fXg1FhS01vgmfPsakeB1HR8QwlD4XUhB/cCXDXBnXRRrSPY64sJT4eVwG0Fmz2fz FpMcJ6drxfmHtvNxBB97z+MouG2maZUBYmrr8ITuZUJIJJXHlxCkPqXXh5xZsieuYjPt HJNfk/sKTKbVxSP0/eqx+W7uaRCfl/qL3I/6IP+trsZEj7f7plyx4jt64z2AY4InAuee +flA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dVq4Gc4qhVun03fHlgLABWXya4Orq813sAUlXi8mHKs=; b=e59PUE6+4g32YQLmTZp6hUl6td27RH9vDTl7w9z36Zjo/2RodcWmNxAQeXXz3XEqZ0 E4QdtKHjIu0gQ4lBny6Itu5+Qa3yHxmk9kNZ8bBsqJA27VUjrp9GWTU6kecU23W7Y5E5 2tm5FSSypC/5dM6w67Rgfth2gYldS3yR0GJuXq8Md/IcoYU/jRA5/3ixfVUi1/y/uLsM 6Ou7koyxz3bZymRPVqBTR5fTV901vs0NsA4of4O0q2w3Jeh9QuW5bj/cryAtTu4GYGMY HtJDslWgcjKziDZYhc+CAbQgR+xrGNVX2nyGeVurYYp46sTaXNx6Sv7FRKHpZFcN1/fS d/pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLRJd7dBqRa6jIC4xo9aNyglY6PwTgTPeIPX6YPm7l8bcwYNzpCbB7hM8NLJpbsqxZtmi8yj6GqgB187A==
X-Received: by 10.129.98.130 with SMTP id w124mr6920536ywb.222.1465501892697; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.215.149 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:51:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbYjgCp-md-nsg5nL1kTnQb4Wjv1PgZQrRxojLJ6r8n_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114707f8bb63310534ddbf03
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/gIqRARbyuYrSlyodtCxpBeIKvKc>
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] dispatch vs. apps-discuss (was Re: Regular Expressions for Internet Mail Identifiers (draft-seantek-mail-regexen))
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:51:35 -0000

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:

>
> PS I am still a bit confused about the distinction between dispatch@ and
> apps-discuss@ at this point for getting practical work done. But based on
> the most recent directive e-mails, I am going with posting this (on the
> understanding that dispatch@ is not meant for "actual technical work").
>

As APPSAWG is nearing its end, this list is now the general ART discussion
list.  It's basically no longer a working group list but one for topics of
general interest to the participants of the ART area.

DISPATCH is for doing things under the charter of that working group, which
is to say proposing work and, if there's sustained support for it, finding
a home for that work.

This post, which is basically "Hi, I have a draft, please read it and let
me know what you think" belongs here.  When the question becomes "How
should we process this through the IETF (if at all)?", it becomes a
candidate for DISPATCH.

-MSK, co-chair of both