Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-01.txt
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 27 January 2012 00:59 UTC
Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6721F8707 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zqqU1z+xH55l for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E6E21F8699 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from malice.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.71) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:46 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:46 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:59:44 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-01.txt
Thread-Index: AczX9293BkYwwJAkT3+XKhVLEOgcEwEl17XA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DA04@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C89DFAA9@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <20120121044437.94978.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120121044437.94978.qmail@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:59:47 -0000
Thanks for this, John. I'm working them into the next version. Among the notes I made for possible topics, I have one outstanding question: Should a greylister return a 421 reply and drop the connection when enforcing the rule, or some other 4yz code? Or does it matter? -MSK
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-gre… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy