Re: IMAP extensions needed for SPAM/HAM and WHITE/BLACK listing

George Michaelson <ggm@pobox.com> Wed, 08 July 2009 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <geeohgeegeeoh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBBF3A6F9D for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9+6QDNvX7u1 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C803A6A6D for <discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so2071632ewy.37 for <discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=TXGOqBBjbdG9nXZAFR79a2n2MsazOtTdRvdhoCvIooU=; b=NQk57XltAke0iE7kWCRT7H0wqFsmRkobkUn5XDMgS21BgacIhWqog3xlYn1RdmP6RI YLrgX6bpp9J/1f112knqqr9xnrhCrMb7raCi4GpQvvwOZZtAjv41E19s0NzKC/mQMeby eVn36eHb3AzFZyHIs/nScOpeGowqWF3ZuGX2k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=ZwEzaNEjT+YsIf+t5klQYJEkYjykNSrF5W2HdSnz8c5SXePXIu6zu4YOOVKxBJCKmf ai/4sMfp3DF6ylc03AQWZTEMDR93uudksCQ9x3okpwUnv3Fmt9rFXvElZCPV2O4VRPHg Nn+b5V/J+DWWVxERWoF2yAmccVjbmIYdsO9Yg=
Received: by 10.210.109.19 with SMTP id h19mr8612445ebc.56.1247092068279; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192-168-1-5.tpgi.com.au (60-240-104-100-nsw-pppoe.tpgi.com.au [60.240.104.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1176374eyg.19.2009.07.08.15.27.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: George Michaelson <geeohgeegeeoh@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <4A25E43A-83E3-4A59-9C0B-C334820275BF@pobox.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@pobox.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01NB1TV04NJS001ML6@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Subject: Re: IMAP extensions needed for SPAM/HAM and WHITE/BLACK listing
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:27:39 +1000
References: <371C2EEC-8CBD-4AC1-B07A-928352E19DCB@pobox.com> <F9D917EB-A09B-48BB-AA30-F31EADEDD7DD@muada.com> <28941.1246868682.560969@puncture> <4A51D1A1.5040507@isode.com> <01NAZVQAYWH4001DLH@mauve.mrochek.com> <47CB230E-B713-4098-82D4-318744434C46@pobox.com> <01NB0BOZYUPY001ML6@mauve.mrochek.com> <6DECD560-B257-4E6E-80E7-A99A69D297C6@pobox.com> <01NB14JAPS8E001ML6@mauve.mrochek.com> <F4A90756-9251-4CB8-9776-77F3202617A5@pobox.com> <01NB1TV04NJS001ML6@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: ietf-imapext@imc.org, general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:27:24 -0000

>>
>
> The place where I'd like to see white and black listing done is in  
> CARDDAV, not
> IMAP.
>
> 				Ned

so there's only one real question: if it was standardized, would the  
likes of google implement it? How about the client side?

because, unless its in gmail AND in the Apple Mail client,  
Thunderbird, Outlook, its not useful.

-G