Re: [apps-discuss] Looking to begin discussion about email and IPv6

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 19 May 2012 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84BE21F8653 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.731, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qeN+M26YHb+5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C1121F864C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so2830270lag.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iSbxuhIfaaPQGt/dM/aEp/XZZW02R+nj6vvb8c14VBg=; b=nSR9pJ+39NAq5Ax61Ayfsh8/Zw1WSfJXAlcAIiOEnVNK7XHdRsxjMIotQZvgDLAGCM eHggyrSLIJzrJ3eNBhL1ahS6DrEL27GE6eRLfjCHCSXUA9ef4+sQ+Vq19tMDgXIoa8kQ GDqKyTEWD9gBnJV0ePtfN3zPQNzY0iQ8yyGPlJhXxDycJFjFs8lt8C2+7Ao9OTZIqPAP ld8jLwsGA0Y0wZdX6vU0sMyaWbDCTbtOPRSnP+C5IrokSP0TjhjAsjAldeR7MDfcZOvs GoIFPrkaKuDjz32WC/iMY1vrmQHuWi0W8xFZK7apH3KF2YfWBPaOyWOzlYO7Cgd8iz+h +Udw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.233 with SMTP id it9mr3162157lab.40.1337393532085; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.7.7 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <58ce87ab9c524c9c86f916d8181fe579@DF-PIO-DUB15M41.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <7c2b29c999e1441890f63fbb91692de0@DF-PIO-15M30.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280CC331@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F7E1F7F.6070100@stpeter.im> <58ce87ab9c524c9c86f916d8181fe579@DF-PIO-DUB15M41.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:12:11 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hwhitZWwq1eiE67JQ9yeF65uXDo
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBcuHo9TsNjEDidUbw=YDFzEG_w2u4ph2uML4iVv=mLNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Looking to begin discussion about email and IPv6
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 02:12:13 -0000

Hi, Terry.

> I have written my very first Internet Draft and uploaded it to the IETF site, and it passed
> all of the nits.  It is available here:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/41308/
>
> It is entitled "Recommendations for the use of whitelists for email senders transmitting
> email over IPv6".  The abstract in the summary page is correct, but if you click on the
> .txt file, it is wrong (I uploaded an older version of the draft, tried to fix it but couldn't...

If it's the wrong version, it's probably not a great idea to get
people to review it yet... and it looks like you actually cancelled
the submission, so the draft is not really in the system.  I'll
contact you off list to help you get the right version uploaded.
Sometimes the system can be a bit confusing the first time one tries
to use it.

Barry