Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-01.txt

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3C221F851F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7JDrpqLsTyO for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381DF21F8512 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so1943231wyh.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=YQXzQtexMDt9/76GeW5lX5WWHlch2cIAaiH8fjLXDDY=; b=cb6xbJewqV+ftPCju3BqPrLywtsswO+jay9umkTQbZ6+olyEh/KUwN6B2bfICah+zg tTmjymHIviZArHgJ5Ms9yfycN6JvPkB2v/lNfthEmbMv7SRkEzoShEzfxkEBkg/fJqO2 Th0gY1550hkVbPIDPTqmQb6qsh/MuWxSa3y34=
Received: by 10.227.170.68 with SMTP id c4mr2587068wbz.62.1319030442097; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.134 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E9DE481.4090607@stpeter.im>
References: <20111018203341.3470.52152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E9DE481.4090607@stpeter.im>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:20:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybo0q3U8bxBN5b8W4nwE4GceKFa9E-809Om=+aeVwMH2Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:20:45 -0000

On 18 October 2011 22:41, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-01

Thanks.

How about adding RFC 4395 as another example for an IANA registry
permitting provisional registrations?  And maybe the "provisional"
feature should get a SHOULD or MAY in section 3, not only a note
in appendix B.

-Frank