Feedback requested:FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Mon, 27 April 2009 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844293A6E95 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.023
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.023 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JEq+k9HvlDXX for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [83.149.65.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7D43A6B9E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.3.180] (wlap003.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n3R9BGCK014101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:11:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <45212F9C-51BA-4A0F-93B1-E64CD499DB81@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Feedback requested:FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:10:48 +0200
References: <20090427084757.ED90228C0D0@core3.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:11:28 -0000

Hi all,

In the BEHAVE wg we're working on IPv6-to-IPv4 translation. One  
prominent protocol that has trouble with this is FTP, so we're  
thinking of making an FTP ALG part of this. I wrote a draft on how to  
do this, and I would very much like some feedback. The draft is only 6  
pages.

Thanks,

Iljitsch van Beijnum

Begin forwarded message:

> Filename:	 draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64
> Revision:	 01
> Title:		 An FTP Application Layer Gateway for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation
> Creation_date:	 2009-04-27
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 6

> Abstract:
> The only FTP mode that works without changes through an IPv6-to-IPv4
> translator is extended passive, introduced in 1998.  However, many
> existing FTP servers don't support this mode, making it impossible to
> support the File Transfer Protocol through an IPv6-to-IPv4 translator
> without an Application Layer Gateway.  This document describes the
> behavior of such an ALG.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64-01.txt